On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 17:02, Bob Ippolito wrote: > The biggest complaint I've heard, and I believe the reason for the > optional alternative database implementation in 1.1, is that the > Berkeley DB must be on a single local volume. Having nothing to do with svn's choice of bdb, my biggest complaint about subversion is its lack of a mature merging algorithm. Still, it's not worse than cvs and there are plenty of other advantages. We also had some horrendous stability problems early on, but it looks like the newer versions are pretty stable. We haven't lost any data or seen mysterious re-appearances in months <wink>. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040907/b1c38b9c/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4