Edward Loper wrote: >> Then, the question is where copyfuncattrs should live, and I would >> object that to be yet another builtin. > > > Having trouble parsing this sentence -- do you mean that you object to > making it a builtin, or did you mean "I would expect that to be..."? The former. No more builtins. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4