Anthony Baxter wrote: [SNIP] > I thought about cutting a 2.4a4, but decided against it. For one thing, > it'd mean Martin would need to cut more Windows installers, if we don't > want to end up with mismatched windows installers and tarballs. For > another, it's an _alpha_ release, and so it's not as vital as if it'd > been something like a 2.3.4 bug, or a 2.4 final. > Does this mean that CVS is open to major checkins again? I assume so, but Misc/NEWS has not been given a new section for 2.4b1 so I thought I would double-check before doing a major checkin. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4