Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > The PEP was about simplification. Tossing in unnecessary unicode > coercions is not in line with that goal. > > Does anyone else think this is a crummy idea? Yes. Whatever MAL and Barry thinks, Python's current model is 8+8=8, U+U=U, and 8+U=U for ascii U. That's an advantage, not a bug. > Is everyone ready for unicode coercions to start sprouting everywhere? No. And when that time comes, storing everything as 32-bit characters is not the right answer either. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4