Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Channelling Anthony (Baxter), this cannot be accepted for 2.3. > It would allow for code that works on 2.3.5, but fails on 2.3.4. > What's worse, the extension module can be built on 2.3.5, and > the binary module will fail when run on 2.3.4, as importing the > CAPI object would fail. Ugh. Thanks for the clarification. I really don't think that this is something we want to add to 2.3.5.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4