RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 2 18:26:12 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-September/048544.html

Tim Peters wrote:
> [Anthony Baxter]
> 
>>Erm - this particular fix was a bug fix. I'm deeply uncomfortable about
>>adding the C version of datetime to 2.3 at this very late stage of 2.3's
>>life cycle.
> 
> 
> It's quite arguably a bugfix, since datetime.h in 2.3.4 exposes things
> that can't possibly be used outside of datetimemodule.c 

Ah - I misunderstood, and thought that 2.3 had no version of datetime.c
at all, and Guido was proposing that we add it. So, to get this
straight, what _are_ we talking about, exactly? Is there an SF
bug/patch with the trunk change?

-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-September/048544.html below:

[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules threadmodule.c, 2.56, 2.56.8.1