[Johannes Gijsbers] > Hum, I didn't realize os.chmod() worked this differently on Windows. Seems like > I bumped into bug #755617 (os module: Need a better description of "mode"). Per > that bug, I googled for '_chmod msdn' and came up with the attached patch. > However, I don't have a Windows machine handy to test. Could someone with a > Windows machine try the patch? I'll try it, but there were no attachments. Distinctions among "user", "group" and "world" are unique to Unix. Windows has a much more elaborate permission scheme than that, but at chmod()'s feeble level it's essentially just "nobody can delete me" or "anyone can delete me".
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4