Brett C. wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: > >> M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> ... >> >>> Maybe we should have this discussion on more general grounds: >>> do we really want a fat Python distribution or should we focus >>> more on making installation of third-party tools easier ? >> >> >> >> I think you hit the nail on the head. For myself, I think we want to >> make it *much* easier to install 3rd-party tools. I also think we need >> to make it *much* easier to *update* the modules that come with Python >> without having to wait for a new Python release (much as it is easy to >> update packages in a linux distribution). >> > > OK, so is everyone So far, we're far from everyone. :) > just talking about coming up with our own version of > CPAN, or does this also include replacing Distutils? I see this building on or working with distutils. > And for those of you not in the Mac world, MacPython already has > something called packman that downloads 3rd-party apps and installs them > by running their setup.py scripts. Right, I refered to that in my note. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4