On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 13:08, Carlos Ribeiro wrote: > This is a big issue. If the sqlite library supports a bigger and > richer API _as part of the standard Python library_, then everyone > else (Python's end users and developers) will naturally expect that > all other rdbms will support the same API. I don't agree. Every one of the FOSS RDBMs has a different C API so I wouldn't expect the Python module wrapping the native APIs to be anything but a more-or-less straight exposure of that -- with some liberties taken to Pythonify the APIs where appropriate, e.g. PyBSDDB has a done a very good job there. The common API is the DB-API, although it would be nice if there were more commonality amongst the various implementations. I do agree that further discussion probably belongs on other lists. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20041020/9fdbbf3f/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4