RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 20 12:49:39 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049520.html

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

    Martin> If you want to push one of these patches, and you don't
    Martin> want to use the procedure of guaranteed review that I
    Martin> promise, you can still use the begging procedure that most
    Martin> people come up with.

Sure.  I don't suggest reducing price in order to get you to review
more patches.  What I like about your procedure is that it encourages
people to get involved in helping each other in developing Python.
While python-dev is really excellent for mentoring design and
implementation, this looks like a good way to get people involved in
reviewing.  I think that activity is normally under-staffed in most
projects.

I'd-rather-be-coding-too-ly y'rs,

-- 
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049520.html below:

[Python-Dev] Patches