RetroSearch Browse

Fri Oct 15 20:40:22 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049443.html

Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 00:36, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'm extremely unconvinced that the semantics of "-m package" or
>>"-m package.module" are suitably well thought out to see it in b1.
>>
>>If a single compelling way of making it work can be seen in the
>>next week, _maybe_ we could sneak it into b2, but I'm really not
>>hopeful.
> 
> 
> Okay, based on the discussions so far, I'm going to have to agree. 
> While I do think it's a very useful feature, it's more important to do
> it right than to do it right now.  Which means it should probably go
> through the full PEP treatment.
> 

+1 from me.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049443.html below:

[Python-Dev] Supporting packages on the command line