RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 13 10:19:26 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049365.html

Thomas Heller wrote:

>> (removing the pywin stuff from the module would hamper development of new
>> features, and also make it harder to verify that the _subprocess module works
>> as it should).
>
> Hm, that what the tests are for, and not code that is never executed.

if you remove the _subprocess driver, it is executed.  _subprocess is just
a win32all emulator...

> A working solution would be to comment out this stuff, or put it into an
> 'if 0:' block, in both cases one could easily activate it again for
> experimentation.

does py2exe support "if 0" blocks?

</F> 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-October/049365.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Re: python/dist/src/Lib subprocess.py,NONE,1.1