On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 23:27, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I'm starting to lean that way myself. The semantics for a straight module are > easy, but the package version is horrible (Either we have a package getting > imported before "__main__" starts running, or else we don't properly support > package __path__ variables. I don't find either option appealing) > > I think I'll simply drop all package support from the patch and allow modules > only. That will still cover the initial use cases (pdb, profile and the like) > Adding support for packages later (in a different patch) would still be possible > if there was interest. +1 and I'd still love to see this in Python 2.4. Could you please assign the patch to someone other than me though? I don't honestly think I'll have time to review it before 2.4b1. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20041002/4475e5a7/attachment-0001.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4