> I was in fact thinking of the -m proposal when I wrote that... The timing does suck. > It's so easy to define an alias or use a one-line shell script for > invoking Python with a full pathname that I'm really not sure I like > the -m idea, My understanding was that it wasn't about a full pathname to python, it was about searching sys.path for the darned script so us poor Windows guys don't have to change directories a million times a day (no aliases or shebangs for us either). I have a big pile of batch files just to invoke timeit, texchecker, profile, etc. It bites the big one. If the patch doesn't get worked out for Py2.4, I hope it doesn't get abandoned. > Supporting it with packages seems insanity. No doubt. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4