[Guido] > > Of course. Other recent proposals for brand new stuff also seem poorly > > timed. [Nick] > I may be guilty of that. Would it be worth adding a Python 2.5 group to > the SF > Patch tracker for things which shouldn't be considered seriously until > after 2.4 > final is out the door? Though ill timed, the -m idea is honking good. If it can be reliably worked out in its simplest form (not trying to be all things to all packages), it's worth going ahead for Py2.4. Command line guys like me need this every day. His patch will address a continual source of irritation and make the tool more pleasant to use. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4