Guido van Rossum wrote: >>My thinking on the XML idea is that people do write apps where the whole thing >>is behind a GUI and thus XML makes good sense. So why not make there lives a >>little easier by giving them a basic API? > > > People who want to use XML already have all the rope they need. I > would be in for adding something like my simplified XML handling class > to the library, but I first have to lobby my employer to open-source > it (not a problem, I just have to time the request right so it won't > be in 2.4). Anyway, this needn't and shouldn't be specific to the > problem of storing option values. > OK. > >>OK, so how do people want to proceeed with this? PEP? Shootout? > > > I'm all for working code in this case, so let's do a shootout. > OK. Should we do an announcement to python-announce and c.l.py saying we are looking for a new API for .ini file editing/accessing? -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4