A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/050159.html below:

[Python-Dev] Small subprocess patch

[Python-Dev] Small subprocess patch [Python-Dev] Small subprocess patchPeter Åstrand astrand at lysator.liu.se
Tue Nov 30 21:33:06 CET 2004
I'm planning to change the signature for subprocess.call slightly:

-def call(*args, **kwargs):
+def call(*popenargs, **kwargs):

The purpose is to make it clearer that "args" in this context is not the
same as the "args" argument to the Popen constructor. Two questions:

1) Is it OK to commit changes like this on the 2.4 branch, in addition to
trunk?

2) Anyone that thinks that "kwargs" should be changed into "popenkwargs"?


/Peter Åstrand <astrand at lysator.liu.se>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4