Thomas Heller wrote: > "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal at egenix.com> writes: > > >>I just tried to compile some extensions on Win XP with .NET 1.1 >>and Python 2.4c1 installed. >> >>It turns out that the distutils recognition logic for finding >>a suitable C compiler is not able to find the compiler by simply >>looking at the PATH, INCLUDE and LIB settings of the OS instead >>of poking around in the registry :-) >> >>Now since extensions for 2.4 will have to be built using the >>same compiler as Python itself (the one that comes with VC7.1 >>which is the same as the one in the freely downloadable >>.NET 1.1 SDK), I would suggest to make distutils aware of the >>compiler by looking on the PATH in case the registry doesn't >>have the VC7.1 entries. > > I always wondered if non-present registry entries wouldn't mean that the > MSVC installation is broken. Not at all: their C compiler works just fine once you setup the OS environment by loading the sdkvars.bat file. > OTOH, I always used the official MS IDEs, > and never tried their free compilers - is this desire related to the > free ones? Yes. distutils doesn't need any IDE to compile extensions, just a compiler and a command line :-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Nov 26 2004) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4