Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Also, the pep would likely kill the remote, but non-zero chance of ever > getting the a,b,*c syntax. IOW, the pep may be a step backwards. Officially killing that syntax was actually one of the stated goals of the PEP. However, the PEP editors would be well within their rights to reject the draft as 'lacking focus'. I wouldn't be offended given the whole 20 minutes it took to write it :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia Email: ncoghlan at email.com | Mobile: +61 409 573 268
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4