RetroSearch Browse

Fri Nov 19 05:01:42 CET 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/050017.html

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> Brett C. wrote:
> 
>>I have been mulling over this proposal and I think I am finally
>>settling on +0 as long as it can be shown that it does not hurt
>>performance at all (yes, it shouldn't but this is the eval loop we are
>>talking about and that thing is a touchy beast).
> 
> 
> Is there a standard benchmark I could use to demonstrate the
> impact of the two new additions on the runtime?
> Thanks!

=)  Parrotbench and PyBench would be enough for me to sign off on any 
performance hit.  There is also pystone.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/050017.html below:

[Python-Dev] proposal+patch: sys.gettickeraccumulation()