Samuele Pedroni wrote: >> What good is that? > > > > I agree with the spirit of the observation, but I think that aspect is > immaterial. Personally I think some form of this feature is valuable as > long as it means getting inspect.getsource (and companions) or some > variation working no matter what. So as long as what goes in the > attribute covers the cases not working today, that should be fine. > of course depending on the scenarios one has in mind, working may mean produce always an output but with the same limitations from code in py files, or produce a correct output even in the case of file editings.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4