Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 02:01 PM 11/16/04 -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:51:06 -0800, Stelios Xanthakis >> <sxanth at ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: >> > >> > Hi. >> > >> > I posted a message on c.l.p a couple of days ago about a >> > python patch which adds a member __pycde__ to functions and >> > classes. This member is a string which holds the python code of >> > the function/class. (It works in interactively defined code >> > and exec'd definitions) >> >> Functions already have a reference to code objects. How is this >> different? > > > I believe he means the Python source code; I personally would suggest a > name like '__source__' instead of '__pycode__' as the attribute name. > > Of course, I'd also almost prefer to have the AST than the original > source... ;) a prerequiste for that is likely the ast-branch, because the old "A"STs are not a reasonable format to be mandated for all python implementations.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4