On Tue, Nov 16, 2004, Stelios Xanthakis wrote: > > I posted a message on c.l.p a couple of days ago about a > python patch which adds a member __pycde__ to functions and > classes. This member is a string which holds the python code of > the function/class. (It works in interactively defined code > and exec'd definitions) > > Supposing that: I ported this to 2.4b2 and made it have zero overhead > when python runs in normal mode, is there any chance it would be > considered a candidate for inclusion in mainline python? There is zero chance it'll go into 2.4. There's a decent chance it'll go into 2.5, but if you get any pushback on the feature, be prepared to write up a full PEP. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ WiFi is the SCSI of the 21st Century -- there are fundamental technical reasons for sacrificing a goat. (with no apologies to John Woods)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4