Nick Bastin wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2004, at 5:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> I've also discovered that the profiler documentation in Python 2.4 still >> describes the old behaviour (i.e. C-code time getting charged to the >> calling Python function). (I'll put a bug report on SF for that one) > > > Doh, I thought I'd found all of the places in the doc that needed to be > corrected. If you file an SF bug, or just let me know where, I'll fix > the documentation to reflect the current state of things. The bug report is on SF as of last night. . . *checks browser history for the number*. . . it's bug #1066607. Section 10.6 is the one on Limitations. Also, the front page of the hotshot documentation could probably use a warning that the actual profile module copes with C extensions better than hotshot does (I think hotshot still has the old "C time goes to the calling Python function" behaviour - I haven't checked that recently, though) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia Email: ncoghlan at email.com | Mobile: +61 409 573 268
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4