Armin Rigo wrote: > So who's wrong: the documentation of list.pop() or its implementation? > It would be nicely regular if we could pop slices. That's an interesting observation. I was somewhat concerned that this kind of overloading might be confusion, but given that it is even already documented (with nobody noticing), I'm now very much in favour of allowing to pop slices. Of course, whoever implements the change should make sure that slices are applicable consistently everwhere the documentation says they should be. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4