On Fri, Nov 12, 2004, Armin Rigo wrote: > > The struct module is too lazy in checking for overflows (it only > checks some cases on some architectures). See patch #1038854. The > question is: can we make it strict this late in the 2.4 release > process? This *will* break some user code; the proof is that it > breaks some standard library code, e.g. gzip.py, which uses a signed > typecode when it really means an unsigned one. +1 on fixing it now, assuming you can find an appropriate reviewer. Bugfixing is allowed during beta, and relying on this behavior is a bug. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ WiFi is the SCSI of the 21st Century -- there are fundamental technical reasons for sacrificing a goat. (with no apologies to John Woods)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4