RetroSearch Browse

Mon Nov 8 21:49:56 CET 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/049848.html

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:38:31 +0100, Johannes Gijsbers <jlg at dds.nl> wrote:

> Sounds good to me, with the following caveat. Before adding this
> comment, do a casual check whether the bug has been reproduced by
> another developer and/or whether you can reproduce it yourself. Don't
> spend too much time on it, but just check whether it's obvious the bug
> still exists. Wouldn't want to see bugs like http://python.org/sf/548176
> or http://python.org/sf/531205 get closed because of lack of response.

FWIW, I tested these two bugs on 2.3 and 2.4b2, and added an
appropriate comment. If there are any other such bugs, it's easy
enough to do this yourself.

Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/049848.html below:

[Python-Dev] Policy about old Python versions