On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 02:28:32PM -0300, Batista, Facundo wrote: > So I propose to take the job of getting into each one of these bugs and > comment: > > """ > Please, could you verify if this problem persists in Python 2.3.4 or 2.4? > > If yes, in which version? Can you provide a test case? > > If the problem is solved, from which version? > > Note that if you fail to answer in one month, I'll close this bug as "Won't > fix". > > Thank you! > """ Sounds good to me, with the following caveat. Before adding this comment, do a casual check whether the bug has been reproduced by another developer and/or whether you can reproduce it yourself. Don't spend too much time on it, but just check whether it's obvious the bug still exists. Wouldn't want to see bugs like http://python.org/sf/548176 or http://python.org/sf/531205 get closed because of lack of response. By the way: you know about the 'canned response' facility, right? Saves you from copy and pasting the same response over and over again. Cheers, Johannes
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4