A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/049839.html below:

[Python-Dev] Synchronous and Asynchronous servers in the standard library

[Python-Dev] Synchronous and Asynchronous servers in the standard library [Python-Dev] Synchronous and Asynchronous servers in the standard libraryAlex Martelli aleaxit at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 8 14:52:09 CET 2004
On 2004 Nov 08, at 06:50, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> a. Cannot use NT I/O completion ports. Again, what's wrong
>    with select? Performance? I'd really like to see a Python
>    application where the speed gain from IOCP is significant

Isn't it the case that, on Windows, select can only use sockets while 
IOCP would also enable the use of other things such as files?  I 
remember that something like that used to be the case, but it's been a 
while since I did Windows, so my memory may be off or currently 
obsolete.  But if it's accurate it seems to me that -- on Windows -- 
select does not allow smooth integration of non-socket sources while 
IOCP might.


Alex

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4