On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 18:17, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > I think aiming at rewriting ht2html > in Python for 2.5 would be a worthwhile goal (I have dropped the > idea that conversion to xml would be worthwhile). Did you mean the Doc/perl stuff instead of ht2html? The latter is already Python (but you knew that). > Then, the release manager could trivially build the documentation. > For that to work, it is necessary that the documentation builds out > of the box; for that to happen, it is necessary that a broad audience > can build the documentation, so that problems are detected long > before the release (i.e. short after a checkin - or better yet, > before). For the PostScript/PDF release, one certainly needs TeX, > but that is free software. Actually, building the html documentation isn't hard, and I generally do it whenever I'm making a change to .tex files. I may not always write Fred-happy markup but I try to make sure it's at least syntactically correct. It's also a useful thing to have around for when there's no net access. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20041104/cdd83d0e/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4