Mihai Ibanescu wrote: > Can someone confirm this is indeed an overflow by one in socketmodule.c? Yes. With some luck (e.g. on x86 with gcc), it might not cause buffer overruns, as a) the compiler overallocates on the stack because of padding, anyway, and b) the overwriting might write into the next variable (i.e. retval), which is uninitialized at this point, anyway. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4