Brett C. wrote: > Best solution I can think of is somehow come up with a way to remove the > need for Martin to do 4 somehow. This shouldn't be that bad as it currently is. *Anybody* could actually do this - there is no need to do it within the release process (except perhaps during a1). I don't see a problem with the CVS reporting numbers that wait for a release a few weeks. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4