RetroSearch Browse

Mon Nov 1 09:19:24 CET 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/049726.html

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 01:50:29 -0500, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
> For the time being, I think it would be best to use sleep() instead of
> utime().  While it costs three seconds, at least we know it to be a
> platform independent test.  It is rather late in the game to be
> debugging OS specific problems introduced by a new check-in.

Okay.  I am convinced about using sleep() always.  And two seconds
will be enough to wait for new timestamp value. :)  Will check it
in right now.

Hye-Shik

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-November/049726.html below:

[Python-Dev] Tests broken on Windows