At 02:09 AM 6/1/04 +0200, Christian Tismer wrote: >Anyway, I don't really get the point. >95% of Stackless is doing soft-switched stackless calls. >Behavior is completely controllable. We can easily avoid >any special C stack operation, by setting a flag that >disallows it (easy to implement) or by excluding the hard >switching stuff, completely (not an option now, but easy, too). If soft-switching is portable (i.e. pure C, no assembly), and is exposed as a library module (so that Jython et al can avoid supporting it), then perhaps a PEP for adding that functionality to mainstream Python would be meaningful. If that gets in, then the other 5% can always sneak in later via feature creep. ;) Or, more importantly (if I understand correctly), it could be separately distributed as an add-on for platforms that can support it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4