RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 31 15:41:05 EDT 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-May/045038.html

At PyCON I rewrote site.py .  The biggest change is that I broke it into 
functions and moved it over to use sets.  Basically the file was just 
old and I brought it up to modern usage.  Performance-wise I can't see a 
real difference between the current version and my rewrite by executing 
``time ./python.exe -c "pass"``; fluctuations in values are standard 
white noise.  Breaking it up into functions also allowed me to write a 
test suite for site.py .

Patch 921793 (http://www.python.org/sf/921793) has the patch of my 
rewrite.  Does anyone object to me applying the patch?  Of course I 
would love to have someone take a look at the code since this gets 
executed every time.  I have been using the rewritten version since 
PyCON (so about two months) and I haven't had a bug yet.

Obviously I would like to get this into 2.4a1 to get as much testing as 
possible.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-May/045038.html below:

[Python-Dev] Anyone object to a rewrite of site.py?