RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 31 13:34:19 EDT 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-May/045030.html

Does this mean that the implementation of Stackless 3.0 could be 
acceptable to integrate into CPython 2.5?  It would be absolutely 
wonderful to have those capabilities available in the standard 
distribution!

-Shane Holloway

Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> Eyal Lotem wrote:
>  > Why is Python still not stackless?
> 
> But it is: http://www.stackless.com/
> 
> If you are asking: Why is python.org Python still not
> stackless? then I think the answer has varied over time.
> 
> The most recent answer is that no volunteer has stepped
> forward to make Python stackless. That, in turn, likely
> hasn't happened because it is hard to do, and because
> nobody has seen any reason to do so as you could always
> use Stackless Python.
> 
> Regards,
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/shane.holloway%40ieee.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-May/045030.html below:

[Python-Dev] Stackless Python