> > This is expected in an IEEE754 compliant implementation. > > What's one of them? <wink> I can tell you.. or I'd have to kill you. ;-) > > Something we currently are not (I get different results, as shown). > > Are you using 2.3 or 2.4 here? 2.3.. I wasn't aware about your recent change. Are you planning to include C99 stuff as well? -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4