A discussion (last week?) on c.l.py prompted a thought about .pth files. Feel free to shoot it down ;) The discussion in question concerned someone using a version control system, and needing to change PYTHONPATH depending on which branch they were in. My immediately two thoughts were: 1. Use a build system (e.g. make) to set PYTHONPATH appropriately. This is they type of thing we do. 2. Use a .pth file in the directory the code is run from (or possibly, the same directory as the script). Before posting the second, I thought I'd better try it out - fortunately for me :) Putting a .pth in the current or script directory did nothing. I'm wondering if anyone sees utility in being able to put a .pth file in those locations and have them used in the same way as if they were in the python executable directory. For example, if you have a package 'p', with a 'test' subpackage (containing scripts), it would be very simple to stick a 'test.pth' file into the 'p.test' package, with the sole contents of 'test.pth' being '..'. This would add the (absolute path of the) parent directory to the root paths for module import. I feel there's some kind of link here with PEP 328, but I'm not quite sure where it fits. Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4