Skip Montanaro wrote: > >> I cannot find good definitive documentation on how to use this > >> license in this situation. What text do I need to place or reference > >> in my code? If someone could direct me to that documentation (if it > >> exists) I would very much appreciate it. > > aahz> Just say that it uses the PSF License 1.0. > > As in: > > This package is licensed under the terms of the PSF License, version > 1.0. > > ? I had exactly the same question a few days ago (for the watch project on > SF) but got distracted before I remembered to ask. Maybe this is a question > worth answering on the PSF section of python.org? Alternatively use the BSD or MIT license. There's nothing magical about the PSF license as far as I'm concerned, and its particular wording implies ownership by the PSF, so it's not 'generic', and it refers to other licenses, so another "liberal" license like BSD/MIT works (GPL isn't the same) in terms of the code being 'adoptable' by the PSF. --david
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4