Tino Lange wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > [Patch #945642] > >>>> (TL) Is it possible to include the patch #945642 in 2.3.4? >>> >>> (GT) I'd like to see this in 2.3.4 too [...] >> >> (GvR) Haven't seen the patch, but the description of the fix makes me >> go "+1 >> please!" :-) > > > Hi! > > Hmmm, the 13th is coming soon and still noone has checked that in ... > > But I think there was enough agreement that this really needs to be > merged and checked in soon? > > I understand that there's lots of things to do before such an > maintenance release ... If you like I can offer to do the changes in CVS > by myself - if you don't mind giving me checkin' rights for that. I will > change _ssl.c accordingly for CVS HEAD and also backport it for the > 'release23-maint' branch. Of course I'll also try to check/test once > again that it doesn't break anything. > > No problem if you don't think that this is OK -- but then I'd like to > ask again, that someone of you looks at it soon for 2.3.4 - according to > the posted timeline there are only 3 days left... That's correct. If this is really wanted for 2.3.4, someone needs to step up and get it checked in. Today. -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4