> is ceval > intended to be robust against random strings masquerading as valid byte > code (which would seem require an InvalidByteCode exception). I don't think ceval.c can protect itself against invalid bytecoding without tons of additional checks. For example, BUILD_LIST n, can potentially pop past the beginning of the stack where n is a random code. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4