> Indeed. The timeframe we came up with at PyCon had the > generator expressions being landed "in the first week of > May". At the moment the discussion seems to be spinning > wheels -- it looks (to me) like there's not even 100% > agreement from everyone that they should even go into > 2.4 at all. There doesn't need to be 100% agreement. This thread (which is indeed getting nowhere) started with my assertion that we should do it, using late binding. I haven't changed my mind yet. I'm still waiting for someone to volunteer to review the code once more and check it in. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4