> Alas, the PEP is indeed out of date, and I can't remember exactly > which set of gimmicks Guido favored. The PEP currently says > early-binding is the rule, but I *think* Guido favored mostly-late > binding -- which is late binding, except that the iterable in the > leftmost for-clause is evaluated at once. So > > ... (e1 for stuff in e2 for morestuff in e3 ...) ... > > is effectively replaced by > > def __g(primary): > for stuff in primary: > for morestuff in e3: > ... > yield e1 > > ... __g(e2) ... Exactly. > > I'm not fussed if we slip a week or two here, but if > > it slips another 6 weeks, say, then the release time > > line could be in some trouble. > > Is anyone working (or willing to work) on the PEP, implementation, > and docs now? I can't make time for it, but if I could I think the > semantic issues are settled (in Guido's mind, and possibly in some > email of his I can't find now). How about this one. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4