RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 4 18:03:37 EDT 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-May/044668.html

At 17:53 04.05.2004 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
>[Jeremy]
> >> We are in rather dire need of docs and a revised PEP.
>
>[Anthony]
> > Indeed. The timeframe we came up with at PyCon had the
> > generator expressions being landed "in the first week of
> > May". At the moment the discussion seems to be spinning
> > wheels -- it looks (to me) like there's not even 100%
> > agreement from everyone that they should even go into
> > 2.4 at all.
>
>Well, only one opinion really counts, and the discussion has more the feel
>of whining at a wake about the deceased's bad qualities <wink>.

well, the fact is that this particular deceased is going to stay with us <wink>


>Is anyone working (or willing to work) on the PEP, implementation, and docs
>now?  I can't make time for it, but if I could I think the semantic issues
>are settled (in Guido's mind, and possibly in some email of his I can't find
>now).

that's the one (I think)

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044555.html

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-May/044668.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 289 - Generator Expressions