> > Why does <...> look better than [...]? To me, <...> just reminds me > > of XML, which is totally the wrong association. > > I vote for << >>. The brackets and parens have too many meanings in > Python already. <<staticmethod, foobar(baz)>> looks more like French > than XML. ;) <<...>> has the same practical problems as <...>: no automatic line breaking, >> is ambiguous. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4