A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-March/043841.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318: Decorators last before colon

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318: Decorators last before colon [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318: Decorators last before colonSimon Percivall s.percivall at chello.se
Wed Mar 31 16:40:33 EST 2004
On 2004-03-31, at 23.01, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>> But is the special case of decorated functions/methods really worth 
>> adding a
>> special case to current syntax rules?
>
> Yes.

But is it really wise to add the special syntax required to make your 
work easier (or possible) by overloading a currently perfectly valid 
(if non-sensical) statement? It's one thing that you really, really 
want a better decorator syntax; it's another thing completely that the 
new syntax is an overloaded and restricted list. That's just plain 
wrong for many reasons argued earlier.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4