On 2004-03-31, at 23.01, Bob Ippolito wrote: >> >> But is the special case of decorated functions/methods really worth >> adding a >> special case to current syntax rules? > > Yes. But is it really wise to add the special syntax required to make your work easier (or possible) by overloading a currently perfectly valid (if non-sensical) statement? It's one thing that you really, really want a better decorator syntax; it's another thing completely that the new syntax is an overloaded and restricted list. That's just plain wrong for many reasons argued earlier.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4