> > Taking the prefix position as given for the moment, why overload list > > literal syntax versus something currently illegal and meaningless? > > Such as > > > > <decorator> # almost as easy, or > > Yes. This looks better and will make it more clear that it's a special > case. Otherwise the decorators will look too decoupled from the > function. Why does <...> look better than [...]? To me, <...> just reminds me of XML, which is totally the wrong association. There are several parsing problems with <...>: the lexer doesn't see < and > as matched brackets, so you won't be able to break lines without using a backslash, and the closing > is ambiguous -- it might be a comparison operator. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4