[Tim] > Make r a lot bigger, and I > expect > the genexp will get relatively faster (due to better cache behavior). Also, try a timing with "sum(x for x in xrange(100000))". This will highlight the differences in behavior. With xrange, this genexp will be able to execute entirely in cache. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4