On Mar 31, 2004, at 12:47 AM, Aahz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote: >> Please note that nowhere did I comment that creating such a C >> implementation of Decimal would be easy or even possible. ;) > > Actually, the whole point of the Decimal class is that it's easy to > implement. Once we agree on the API and semantics, converting to C > should be not much harder than trivial. > > Although I ended up dropping the ball, that's the whole reason I got > involved with Decimal in the first place: the intention is that Decimal > written in C will release the GIL. It will be an experiment in > computational threading. That sounds like a phenomenally bad thing to advertise :) -bob
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4