> Except that what you show is currently valid syntax. Making a currently > valid syntax mean something new is, I believe, generally frowned upon. Not in this case. I've thought this through and don't think I see any practical issues with this syntax. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4